Planning Commission- Five Year Plans
After Independence, Indian economy was in a poor condition. For a
new nation, every sector was to be strengthened from the base thereby
strengthening the economy. For all this to happen a consolidated planning was
required. So, the government of India constituted an institution called
PLANNING COMMISSION in 1950 (Planning commission was replaced by NITI AAYOG in
2014).
The
duty of this planning commission is to formulate plans for the effective
utilization of country’s resources and it started implementing five year plans
from 1951. The planning commission from its inception in 1951 till its end in
2014 had formulated 12 five year plans.
The five year plans were the set of programmes to be implemented in a five year term focussing on the problems (or) the sectors which needed attention at that time.
1. FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN (1951-56)
In the first five year
plan, Government emphasised mainly on agricultural sector.All the sectors were
controlled by the government and private sectors had a very minimal role. The
plan was successful yielding good results.
Target growth rate: 2.1%
Achieved growth rate: 3.6%
2.SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN (1956-61)
The second five year plan
was based on MAHALANOBIS STRATEGY, which emphasised promotion of heavy
industries under Government leader ship and generated revenue will be used for
agriculture. Meagre results were attained here.
Target growth rate: 4.5%
Achieved growth rate: 4.1%
3.THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN (1961-66)
The third five year plan
followed inward oriented policy with minimised imports, imposing high import
tariffs. The plan failed here resulting drastic downfall of growth rate.
Target growth rate: 5.5%
Achieved growth rate: 2.5%
4.FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1969-74)
The fourth five year plan
emphasised on agriculture and food security was its primary goal. It also
emphasised on social justice by providing education and employment to under
privileged classes. Still the results are not satisfactory.
Target growth rate: 5.7%
Achieved growth rate: 3.3%
5.FIFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1974-79)
In the fifth five year
plan, the government recognized the failure of the previous plans and this time
the main focus was on anti-poverty and minimum need programmes. This plan yielded
good results.
Target growth rate: 4.4%
Achieved growth rate: 5.2%
6.SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1980-85)
The sixth five year plan
marked a shift in the industrialization pattern from heavy industries to
infrastructure development. Anti- poverty programmes and rural employment
programmes were also launched during this period.
Target growth rate: 5.2%
Achieved growth rate: 5.3%
7.SEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1985-90)
In the seventh five year plan outward
looking policy began with exports receiving priority. From this five year plan
Liberalisation of Indian economy began.
Target growth rate: 5%
Achieved growth rate: 5.8%
8.EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97)
The eighth five year plan
completely changed the face of Indian economy. The role of the government is
minimized and private sector was given priority. India became a market oriented
economy from this period.
Target growth rate: 5.6%
Achieved growth rate: 6.8%
9.NINTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1997-2002)
Greater role to private
sector was continued and new labour, land and legal reforms were introduced in
this period.
Target growth rate: 6.7%
achieved growth rate: 5.4%
10.TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2002-07)
Tenth five year plan
focussed more on services and IT sector and was able to achieve expected
growth rate. But the growth rate in the agriculture sector dropped down.
Target growth rate: 8%
Achieved growth rate: 7.8%
11.ELEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2007-12)
It emphasised more on
agriculture and social sector and environmental sustainability and achieved
agricultural growth rate of 4%.
12.TWELFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2012-17)
It is the present five year plan with the target of achieving
faster, more inclusive and sustainable growth with development of all sectors
and also decided to achieve growth rate of 8%.
Inclusiveness is a multidimensional concept. Which includes following attributes:
- Reduce Poverty
- Improve regional equality across states and within states
- Improve conditions of SCs, STs, OBCs, and minorities
- Generate attractive employment opportunities for youths
- Close gender gap
The twelfth five year plan
has listed following 25 monitorable indicators :
Economic Growth:
1. Real GDP growth at 8%.
2. Agriculture growth at 4%.
3. Manufacturing growth at
10%.
4. Every state must attain
higher growth rate than the rate achieved during 11th plan.
Poverty and Employment
1. Poverty rate to be reduced
by 10% than the rate at the end of 11th plan.
2. 5 Crore new work
opportunities and skill certifications in non-farm sector.
Education:
1. Mean years of schooling to
increase to 7 years.
2. 20 lakh seats for each age
bracket in higher education.
3. End gender gap and social
gap in school enrollment.
Health:
1. Reduce : IMR to 25; MMR to
1. Increase Child Sex Ratio to 950.
2. Reduce Total Fertility Rate
to 2.1
3. Reduce under nutrition of
children in age group 0-3 to half of NFHS-3 levels.
Infrastructure:
1. Investment in
Infrastructure at 9% of GDP
2. Gross Irrigated Area 103
million hectare (from 90 million hectare)
3. Electricity to all
villages; Reduce AT&C losses by 20%.
4. Connect Villages with All
Weather Roads
5. National and State high
ways to a minimum of 2 lane standard.
6. Complete Eastern and
Western Dedicated Freight Corridors.
7. Rural Tele-Density to 70%.
8. 40 Litres Per Capita Per Day
Drinking Water to 50% of rural population; Nirmal Gram Status to 50% of all
Gram Panchayats.
Environment and
Sustainability:
1. Increase green cover by 1
million hectare every year.
2. 30,000 MW renewable energy
during Five Year Period.
3. Emission intensity of GDP
to be reduced to 20-25% of 2005 levels by 2020.
Service Delivery:
1. Banking Services to 90% of
Indian Households.
2. Subsidies and Welfare
related payment to be routed through Aadhar based Direct Cash Transfer Scheme.
Thus,
the five year plans had been playing a major role in the consolidation of
Indian economy since Independence. However there was a need of reform in the
process of planning as it was more than half century old and hardly gone
through a major upgradation. In a federal structure it is not easy to reform an
institution which has been playing essential role in the centre-state financial
relations. The erstwhile 50 years old Planning Commission of the socialist era
was replaced by NITI Aayog earlier this year. Its role is to act as a
think-thank to the government with noted economist Arvind Panagariya as its
vice chairman. The government’s idea of NITI Aayog which is nothing but a much
needed reformed Planning Commission as per the current economic necessities.
