THE HINDU Editorial Vocabulary- November 5, 2016- Topic 1
The order of the Information and
Broadcasting Ministry, directing that Hindi television channel NDTV India be taken off air for 24 hours on November 9, is a serious violation of media
freedom. Coming as it does from a regime that seems to disapprove of any
difference in opinion on issues concerning national security, the suspension
smacks of a disturbing inclination to impose restrictions on journalistic
content. The decision arises from the telecast of developments relating to the terrorist attack on the Pathankot Air Force base in January. The news channel is accused of airing sensitive
information that compromised the safety of military personnel and civilians
even as operations were on to neutralise the attack. According to the
inter-ministerial committee that inquired into the charge, the disclosure of
details relating to the location of the ammunitions depot, the range of weapons
and military assets available there and the presence of civilian residences in
the vicinity could have been used by terrorists to their advantage. The
broadcaster’s defence was that nothing was disclosed that was not published or
aired by other media outlets, that its reportage was largely based on official
briefings and that it was done in a responsible manner.
Ever since media coverage of the terror
attacks in Mumbai in November 2008 created a controversy, it has been accepted
that there is a need for restrained and responsible coverage of anti-terrorism
operations and potential hostage situations. The News Broadcasting Standards Authority,
set up by the News Broadcasters Association, came up with a set of rules. The
Ministry could have either approached the authority, which is headed by a
former Supreme Court judge, or formed an independent panel to adjudicate the
question. Instead, it has invoked a rule introduced in June 2015 that imposes a
blanket ban on all live coverage of any anti-terrorist operation until it ends.
It has cited statutory provisions that empower the government to regulate or
prohibit the transmission of TV programmes. There is no mention of any
provision for appeal. None can reasonably argue that irresponsible live
coverage of an ongoing operation should attract no penalty. A problem arises
when the penalty is decided by a government panel. Taking a channel off air for
however brief a period is a serious decision that could be read as a signal to
other newsrooms to self-censor. A committee of officials is not the ideal body
to make an independent assessment of what constitutes information that poses an
imminent danger to military personnel or civilians. That is the job of an
independent forum.
Vocabulary
Violation: the action of violating someone or something.
Example: The aircraft were in violation of UN resolutions
Airing: express (an opinion or grievance) publicly.
Example: A meeting in which long-standing grievances were aired
Synonyms: express, voice, make public, ventilate, articulate
Disclosure: the action of making new or secret information known.
Example: A judge ordered the disclosure of the government documents
Synonyms: revelation, declaration, announcement, news, report, leak; publishing
Vicinity: the area near or surrounding a particular place.
Example: The number of people living in the immediate vicinity was small
Synonyms: neighborhood, surrounding area, locality, locale, area, local
area
Restrained: characterized by reserve or moderation; unemotional or dispassionate.
Example: He had restrained manners
Synonyms: self-controlled, self-restrained, not given to excesses, sober, steady
Adjudicate: make a formal judgment or decision about a problem or disputed matter.
Example: The committee adjudicates on all betting disputes
Irresponsible: (of a person, attitude, or action) not showing a proper sense of
responsibility.
Example: It would have been irresponsible just to drive on
Synonyms: reckless, rash, careless, thoughtless, foolhardy, foolish, impetuous
